Better tools. Better news.
Wednesday, September 2, 2026 · UTC
1107 of 2345 in this edition
world

Producer Sues Tea Shop Productions Over Profit Share Dispute After 'Obsession' Success

Leonora Ann Darby sues Tea Shop Productions alleging breach of contract and exclusion from profit participation following the film Obsession.

TruthFoundry News Desk
Share on X
Stands on 7 placed sources from 2 publishers.
Darby alleges that Tea Shop Productions and its founders breached agreements regarding profit participation and maintained unequal treatment over several years. [1] Leonora Ann Darby filed a lawsuit for breach of contract against Tea Shop Productions and its founders, James Harris and Mark Lane, on August 28 at the Superior Court of Los Angeles. [2] Darby claims she was incorporated into the company in 2019 with a promise of an equal partnership but was treated as a subordinate while assuming responsibilities across various productions. [3] The producer asserts that Tea Shop Productions received verbal and written commitments to grant her a one-third share of the net profits from films she co-produced. [4] Leonora Ann Darby says she had an agreement with James Harris and Mark Lane to be treated as a producer and to receive one-third of the net profits from films where she was the lead producer. [5] Leonora Ann Darby says the agreement was broken after Obsession became an international hit, denying her the promised one-third share of net profits. [6] The horror film Obsession was directed by Curry Barker. [7]
What this stands on
  1. Darby alleges that Tea Shop Productions and its founders breached agreements regarding profit participation and maintained unequal treatment over several years. · Diario Expreso
  2. Leonora Ann Darby filed a lawsuit for breach of contract against Tea Shop Productions and its founders, James Harris and Mark Lane, on August 28 at the Superior Court of Los Angeles. · Diario Expreso
  3. Darby claims she was incorporated into the company in 2019 with a promise of an equal partnership but was treated as a subordinate while assuming responsibilities across various productions. · Diario Expreso
  4. The producer asserts that Tea Shop Productions received verbal and written commitments to grant her a one-third share of the net profits from films she co-produced. · Diario Expreso
  5. Leonora Ann Darby says she had an agreement with James Harris and Mark Lane to be treated as a producer and to receive one-third of the net profits from films where she was the lead producer. · Mid-day
  6. Leonora Ann Darby says the agreement was broken after Obsession became an international hit, denying her the promised one-third share of net profits. · Mid-day
  7. The horror film Obsession was directed by Curry Barker. · Mid-day
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
Article provenance · 7 sources · v 001worldrecordwritingfiling

How this piece was made: written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona, at the working desk on Wednesday, September 2, 2026. Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.

1 · The world2 publishers reported the events
What they stated is the numbered source list above.
Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read. The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-03T00:31Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)

The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts
4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.
Integrity
Content hash (SHA-256)1cab2a6dc87a36610ffc40288b9fc82e8c7ea59ce8f62afd74297f0398c1a6e6
Hash basisheadline + dek + prose + the canonical citations JSON, exactly as filed
Receiptthis revision predates receipt-keeping; the filed row lives on the record
Machine readablethe full proof, JSON
Verify

A signature proves who filed this and that it has not changed since. It never makes a claim true.

Up next in this editionSupreme Court limits BCI chief's tenure, mandates AG and SG participation