As of 2026-09-02 10:39 UTC.Market figures are as the cited sources reported them at that time and may have moved since. This is news, not investment advice.
A survey commissioned by GS1 US found that 94 percent of U.S. adults were concerned about the frequency of food recalls in 2026, up from 93 percent in 2025. [1]
Optiscan Imaging Ltd, a company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange under the ticker ASX:OIL, has initiated a new clinical study. [2]
UBS initiated coverage of Getinge with a Neutral rating and a price target of 255 Swedish crowns, stating that the medical equipment maker's shares are priced as if quality issues are fully resolved. [3]
67 percent of survey respondents said they had avoided an entire food product category following a recall, up from 60 percent in 2025. [4]
The survey indicated that 80 percent of respondents believed food recalls were effective in protecting public health and safety in 2026, down from 85 percent in 2025. [5]
Optiscan Imaging Ltd has partnered with the Mayo Clinic to conduct this clinical evaluation. [6]
The results of this study are intended to support the company's future submissions to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). [7]
The study is based in the United States and focuses on imaging for head and neck cancer. [8]
Remediation costs have amounted to almost 20% of the company's cumulative free cash flow since 2015, according to UBS. [9]
UBS classified Getinge's portfolio into three buckets - Growth Accelerators, Steady Compounders, and Growth Detractors - with Growth Accelerators expected to rise from under 30% of sales in 2025 to almost 35% by 2030. [10]
UBS forecasts Getinge to deliver a 5% revenue and 12% earnings-per-share compound annual growth rate for 2026-2030, driven by a portfolio mix shift toward higher-growth product categories. [11]
59 percent of respondents said they had discarded recalled food even when their state or region was not affected, compared with 57 percent in 2025. [12]
What this stands on
A survey commissioned by GS1 US found that 94 percent of U.S. adults were concerned about the frequency of food recalls in 2026, up from 93 percent in 2025. · food-safety.com
Optiscan Imaging Ltd, a company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange under the ticker ASX:OIL, has initiated a new clinical study. · South Florida Reporter
UBS initiated coverage of Getinge with a Neutral rating and a price target of 255 Swedish crowns, stating that the medical equipment maker's shares are priced as if quality issues are fully resolved. · Investing.com
67 percent of survey respondents said they had avoided an entire food product category following a recall, up from 60 percent in 2025. · food-safety.com
The survey indicated that 80 percent of respondents believed food recalls were effective in protecting public health and safety in 2026, down from 85 percent in 2025. · food-safety.com
Optiscan Imaging Ltd has partnered with the Mayo Clinic to conduct this clinical evaluation. · South Florida Reporter
The results of this study are intended to support the company's future submissions to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). · South Florida Reporter
The study is based in the United States and focuses on imaging for head and neck cancer. · South Florida Reporter
Remediation costs have amounted to almost 20% of the company's cumulative free cash flow since 2015, according to UBS. · Investing.com
UBS classified Getinge's portfolio into three buckets - Growth Accelerators, Steady Compounders, and Growth Detractors - with Growth Accelerators expected to rise from under 30% of sales in 2025 to almost 35% by 2030. · Investing.com
UBS forecasts Getinge to deliver a 5% revenue and 12% earnings-per-share compound annual growth rate for 2026-2030, driven by a portfolio mix shift toward higher-growth product categories. · Investing.com
59 percent of respondents said they had discarded recalled food even when their state or region was not affected, compared with 57 percent in 2025. · food-safety.com
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
Article provenance · 12 sources · v 001worldrecordwritingfiling
How this piece was made:written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona,
at the working deskon Wednesday, September 2, 2026.
Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.
1 · The world3 publishers reported the events
What they stated is the numbered source list above.Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read.The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-02T22:46Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)
The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts
4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.