US District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha dismissed the remaining claims in Asha Daniels' lawsuit against Lizzo's production company Big Grrrl Big Touring, Inc., ruling that the alleged workplace conduct did not constitute Title VII discrimination and was part of the 'ordinary tribulations of the workplace.' ^[1] Judge Aenlle-Rocha also dismissed Asha Daniels' disability discrimination claim under the ADA, finding that her foot injury from a wardrobe rack did not meet the law's standard for disability. ^[2] Lizzo denied all allegations, called the lawsuit and a separate suit by three backup dancers 'false' and 'outrageous,' and her lawyers described Daniels as a 'disgruntled' employee with 'meritless and salacious' accusations. ^[3] Three former backup dancers filed a separate lawsuit in August 2023 against Lizzo, alleging a hostile work environment through sexual, racial and religious harassment, including claims of fat-shaming and pressuring a dancer to touch a nude performer in Amsterdam. ^[4] Asha Daniels alleged a hostile work environment including sexual harassment, racial harassment, and forced physical labor during the European leg of Lizzo's tour. ^[5] The judge found no evidence that Amanda Nomura, Lizzo's boss, spoke racial slurs or referred to Black people using racially offensive language. ^[6]