Better tools. Better news.
Saturday, September 5, 2026 · UTC
22 of 569 in this edition
world

UN adopts non-binding resolution urging move away from Mercator map to reflect Africa's size

UN General Assembly voted 164-1-6 to adopt a Togo-led, African Union-backed resolution urging replacement of the Mercator map projection.

TruthFoundry Desk
from the fact record
Share on X
Stands on 12 placed sources from 4 publishers.
The UN General Assembly adopted a non-binding resolution with 164 votes in favor, the United States voting against, and six abstentions. [1] The UN General Assembly is scheduled to vote on a resolution urging member states to phase out the Mercator projection. [2] The United Nations is voting on a new world map design intended to display the actual size of the African continent. [3] The UN General Assembly voted on Friday to adopt a new world map that makes the African continent appear larger while making North America and Europe appear smaller. [4] The resolution urges governments, international organizations, and educational institutions to stop using the Mercator map projection in favor of maps that better reflect Africa's size compared with the rest of the world. [5] The resolution was led by Togo and backed by the African Union (UA). [6] The resolution was proposed by Togo and supported by members of the African Union. [7] The United States rejected the resolution, describing the initiative as part of a radical ideological project. [8] The vote is non-binding but is expected to change world maps globally. [9] Africa is highlighted as the continent most affected by the Mercator projection's distortion, appearing much smaller than its actual size. [10] The resolution specifically calls for countries worldwide to stop using the Mercator projection in favor of maps showing Africa's true size. [11] The new map projection is intended to correct the visual distortion caused by the traditional Mercator projection, which exaggerates the size of landmasses near the poles. [12]
What this stands on
  1. The UN General Assembly adopted a non-binding resolution with 164 votes in favor, the United States voting against, and six abstentions. · elpais.com
  2. The UN General Assembly is scheduled to vote on a resolution urging member states to phase out the Mercator projection. · Berlingske
  3. The United Nations is voting on a new world map design intended to display the actual size of the African continent. · Berlingske
  4. The UN General Assembly voted on Friday to adopt a new world map that makes the African continent appear larger while making North America and Europe appear smaller. · hmetro.com.myMalaysia
  5. The resolution urges governments, international organizations, and educational institutions to stop using the Mercator map projection in favor of maps that better reflect Africa's size compared with the rest of the world. · elpais.com
  6. The resolution was led by Togo and backed by the African Union (UA). · elpais.com
  7. The resolution was proposed by Togo and supported by members of the African Union. · B.T.
  8. The United States rejected the resolution, describing the initiative as part of a radical ideological project. · B.T.
  9. The vote is non-binding but is expected to change world maps globally. · B.T.
  10. Africa is highlighted as the continent most affected by the Mercator projection's distortion, appearing much smaller than its actual size. · Berlingske
  11. The resolution specifically calls for countries worldwide to stop using the Mercator projection in favor of maps showing Africa's true size. · Berlingske
  12. The new map projection is intended to correct the visual distortion caused by the traditional Mercator projection, which exaggerates the size of landmasses near the poles. · hmetro.com.myMalaysia
The one we could place publishes from Malaysia. 3 could not be placed by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
Article provenance · 12 sources · v 001worldrecordwritingfiling

How this piece was made: written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona, at the working desk on Saturday, September 5, 2026. Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.

1 · The world4 publishers reported the events
What they stated is the numbered source list above.
Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
The one we could place publishes from Malaysia. 3 could not be placed by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read. The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-05T06:30Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)

The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts
4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.
Integrity
Content hash (SHA-256)b690833119acccf305857b2e57605c659e4fd292480233cbcbe227935a990ed7
Hash basisheadline + dek + prose + the canonical citations JSON, exactly as filed
Receiptthis revision predates receipt-keeping; the filed row lives on the record
Machine readablethe full proof, JSON
Verify

A signature proves who filed this and that it has not changed since. It never makes a claim true.

Up next in this editionIEA Chief Birol: Nations Producing Cheap Electricity Will Lead Global Competition