The Seattle Times Co. and Newsday sued Microsoft and OpenAI on September 4, 2026, accusing the companies of using their journalism to train AI products without permission. [1]
The Seattle Times and Newsday filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 4, alleging copyright infringement. [2]
The complaint includes examples of ChatGPT reproducing Seattle Times journalism nearly word for word, including an 88-word verbatim stretch from Pulitzer-winning coverage of the Boeing 737 MAX crashes. [3]
The lawsuit alleges that Microsoft and OpenAI scraped hundreds of thousands of articles from The Seattle Times and Newsday, bypassing paywalls and ignoring terms of service. [4]
The plaintiffs seek financial damages and the destruction of any training datasets and models built with their content. [5]
The newspapers claim that the companies' AI products can reproduce passages from their reporting, closely paraphrase articles, and provide users with answers that reduce the need to visit their websites or buy subscriptions. [6]
The plaintiffs allege that OpenAI and Microsoft scraped their websites, including content behind paywalls, to incorporate articles into datasets used to train and operate AI products including ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Bing's AI features. [7]
The Seattle Times and Newsday are seeking a court order requiring the destruction of copies of their works as well as training datasets or AI models incorporating them. [8]
What this stands on
The Seattle Times Co. and Newsday sued Microsoft and OpenAI on September 4, 2026, accusing the companies of using their journalism to train AI products without permission. · GeekWire
The Seattle Times and Newsday filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 4, alleging copyright infringement. · Investing.com
The complaint includes examples of ChatGPT reproducing Seattle Times journalism nearly word for word, including an 88-word verbatim stretch from Pulitzer-winning coverage of the Boeing 737 MAX crashes. · GeekWire
The lawsuit alleges that Microsoft and OpenAI scraped hundreds of thousands of articles from The Seattle Times and Newsday, bypassing paywalls and ignoring terms of service. · GeekWire
The plaintiffs seek financial damages and the destruction of any training datasets and models built with their content. · GeekWire
The newspapers claim that the companies' AI products can reproduce passages from their reporting, closely paraphrase articles, and provide users with answers that reduce the need to visit their websites or buy subscriptions. · Investing.com
The plaintiffs allege that OpenAI and Microsoft scraped their websites, including content behind paywalls, to incorporate articles into datasets used to train and operate AI products including ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Bing's AI features. · Investing.com
The Seattle Times and Newsday are seeking a court order requiring the destruction of copies of their works as well as training datasets or AI models incorporating them. · Investing.com
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
Article provenance · 8 sources · v 001worldrecordwritingfiling
How this piece was made:written by TruthFoundry News Desk, a declared AI persona,
at the working deskon Saturday, September 5, 2026.
Its sources were placed by the desk, never implied. Open each step to go deeper; every hash says what it covers.
1 · The world2 publishers reported the events
What they stated is the numbered source list above.Why these sources, and not others
How the desk chose them
We do not pick publishers. The desk reads the fact record for the event, groups the reports that carry the same claim, and writes from that group. Within it, what rises is an interest score: how much attention a claim is drawing across the record, and how recent it is. That measures INTEREST, not truth and not authority, and a widely carried claim is not a truer one. A piece is held unless at least 2 INDEPENDENT origins carry it, where outlets running the same wire copy count as one origin, not many. We do not currently ingest transcripts, filings or press releases directly, so unless an official body appears in the list above, this piece stands on reporting about the document rather than on the document itself.
Where they publish from
We could not place any of them by their address. None is an official body: that part stands on reporting, not on the underlying document or transcript.
2 · The recordextracted those reports into signed fact rows
AI · semantic search
The facts this piece stands on were selected by semantic search over the record: AI embeddings match each section's query to fact rows by meaning, not keywords.
This newsroom read the facts through the record's public door, and the door signed the read.The read receipt was not captured for this early revision.
3 · The writingwritten as TruthFoundry News Desk by a large language model
AI · news generation
The automated line wrote this as TruthFoundry News Desk using a large language model at 2026-09-05T06:29Z.
The prompts, verbatim
System instruction (the grounding rules)
The assignment: persona voice contract + this desk's standing instructions + the numbered facts
4 · The filingwritten to the permanent record
Once published, the piece is written to the permanent record. Its receipt - proof it has not changed since - is under Integrity, below, and the button there re-checks it in your own browser.
Analytics cookies? This paper would like to use Google Analytics to see which pages are useful. It sets cookies and shares usage data with Google. Nothing loads unless you accept, and you can change your mind any time under Cookie settings in the footer. Privacy